Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj?
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 22:26:35 -0800
References: <E16HfTG-0007Lz-00@blount.mail.mindspring.net>

John, you have me there. I give up. 
 Slobodan Dimitrov

"John M. Sikes, Jr." wrote:
> 
> What is "the entitlement of heightened protection"? Who has entitled what?
> 
> ----------
> >From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj?
> >Date: Sat, Dec 22, 2001, 1:11 AM
> >
> 
> > No, of course not. But I think the definition of what is the press and
> > the entitlement of heightened protection is pertinent here.
> >
> >  Slboodan Dimitrov
> >
> > "John M. Sikes, Jr." wrote:
> >>
> >> Libel has nothing to do with it.
> >>
> >> ----------
> >> >From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
> >> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >> >Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj?
> >> >Date: Sat, Dec 22, 2001, 12:06 AM
> >> >
> >>
> >> > You might want to read this little trifle;
> >> > http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0%2C1283%2C48996%2C00.html
> >> > Speaks volumes.
> >> >  Slobodan Dimitrov
> >> >
> >> > "John M. Sikes, Jr." wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>  "Photo journalists" is  an approbation given by the trade to itself.
> There
> >> >> is no civil or criminal statute or principle of law which exempts self
> >> >> styled PJ's from the consequences of their actions.
> >> >> When two persons act in knowing concert, as to outsiders they are equally
> >> >> responsible, as principal and agent in civil law and as co- conspirators
> in
> >> >> criminal law, regardless what names they give themselves.
> >> >> º
> >> > --
> >> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "John M. Sikes, Jr." <mcnaught@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj?)