Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] It's official - the Tri-Elmar rules!
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 06:39:55 +0100
References: <20011221044807.93453.qmail@web9105.mail.yahoo.com>

...except when you need an aperture wider than f4 (a frequent occurrence
for me).

Nathan

Ray Moth wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I am subscribed to Erwin Puts' newletter site and I quote the following
> from his latest newsletter, with due respect to Erwin:
>
> "... About the lenses I can be short: the TriElmar at the 50 position
> is better than the Summicron 2/50 at aperture 4. It may be a surprise,
> but the Summicron is not the nec plus ultra some people assume it to
> be. (Let us forget about the famous Summicron DR controversy). The
> Tri-Elmar is better. Period. In my view the overall best lenses for the
> M are the 24, 28 Summicron, TriElmar, 90 Asph and apo 135..."
>
> That's good enough for me!
>
> Regards,
>
> =====
> Ray
>
> "The trouble with resisting temptation is
>  you never know when you'll get another chance!"
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
> your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
> or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Ray Moth <ray_moth@yahoo.com> ([Leica] It's official - the Tri-Elmar rules!)