Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]...except when you need an aperture wider than f4 (a frequent occurrence for me). Nathan Ray Moth wrote: > Dear All, > > I am subscribed to Erwin Puts' newletter site and I quote the following > from his latest newsletter, with due respect to Erwin: > > "... About the lenses I can be short: the TriElmar at the 50 position > is better than the Summicron 2/50 at aperture 4. It may be a surprise, > but the Summicron is not the nec plus ultra some people assume it to > be. (Let us forget about the famous Summicron DR controversy). The > Tri-Elmar is better. Period. In my view the overall best lenses for the > M are the 24, 28 Summicron, TriElmar, 90 Asph and apo 135..." > > That's good enough for me! > > Regards, > > ===== > Ray > > "The trouble with resisting temptation is > you never know when you'll get another chance!" > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of > your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com > or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- Nathan Wajsman Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw.htm General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html