Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Who'd be a PJ in these troubled times?
From: "John M. Sikes, Jr." <mcnaught@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:18:45 -0500

I agree with Adam. John Sikes,Atlanta

- ----------
>From: Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com>
>To: "leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Who'd be a PJ in these troubled times?
>Date: Thu, Dec 20, 2001, 6:01 PM
>

> When you break the law you take the consequences. Simply being a
> "photojournalist" doesn't disqualify someone from adherence to the law. Quit
> whining, pay the ticket, deal with it.
>
> Actions must have consequences.
>
> I'm sick of activist whiners who put themselves in positions of jeopardy and
> don't have the courage to take what comes their way: civil disobedience with
> no cost is what they want.
>
> BAH!
>
> Adam Bridge
>
> on 12/20/01 12:07 PM, Walter S Delesandri at walt@jove.acs.unt.edu
> thoughtfully wrote:
>
>> Jeezus!!!
>> While I have no use in general for liberal-eco-wacko causes, including
>> Greenpeace, this is reprehensible treatment for a journalist.  We >>DO<< have
>> bigger worries to address in our country (and the world?)...maybe this will
>> die out on it's own, or be thrown out of court.  We hope.
>> Walt
>> (who likes to take pretty pictures of "uplifting", non-political subject
>> material, and who is a registered republican in my county) (just trying to
>> keep the FBI away from my door!)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:41:28 -0800 rp johnson
>> <rpjohnson2@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.epuk.org/news/2001/12/18morgan.html
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Morton
>>> dmorton@journalist.co.uk
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html