Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] if it lives under a bridge it's probably a .....
From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 12:43:42 +0000
References: <ECC6F7B330A26C40B652962C47DEA2581836CB@ASC02.asc.upenn.edu>
At 04:58 PM 12/20/01 -0000, Simon Lamb wrote:
>The build quality of a Hasselblad is definitely in the same league as a
>Leica. It however is not the first thing that would enter many people's
>mind as a wildlife camera, especially if you want long lenses.
Victor Hasselblad made quite a reputation for himself in the '60's and
'70's, gadding about with his eponymous camera and lenses to photograph
wildlife all around the world.
Marc
msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315
Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] if it lives under a bridge it's probably a .....)
Reply from Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> (Re: [Leica] if it lives under a bridge it's probably a .....)
Reply from Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> ([Leica] OT: Hasselblad History)
Reply from "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> (Re: [Leica] if it lives under a bridge it's probably a .....)
In reply to:
Message from Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu> ([Leica] if it lives under a bridge it's probably a .....)