Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dans un courrier daté du 14/12/01 18:29:02 Paris, Madrid, gilplant@hvc.rr.com a écrit : > Dans un courrier daté du 14/12/01 08:38:08 Paris, Madrid, kididdoc@home.com > a > > écrit : > > > >> The Tri Elmar after the first version was available for a short time, > was > >> revised. A second version was released with some mechanical changes, > this > >> being still available...... What excatly were the problems with the first > >> version, and what changes were introduced for the second Version... > >> > >> > >> Is it risky to buy the first version......out of concern for any > mechanical > >> flaw or risk of failure...Steve > >> > > > > Hello Steve . I had the fisrt one . It was less firm in terms of focal > > selection , > > and also the focusing ring seemed harder due to the lack of a tab , which > > they > > add on the later one . > > Optically , the new is the same . Mecanically , it's a little shorter , > > thinner at > > it's end , and as got a nice tab on the focusing ring . > > The first version doesn't show any mecanical flaw and you can buy it > without > > problem . > > Chears > > > > Jo Goodtimes , France > > And the new one has DOF markings for all 3 focal lenghts. > > gilbert > > -- Yeah , How could I forget this important step ! Jo Goodtimes , France - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html