Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Noctilux now TE
From: "SonC (Sonny Carter)" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:59:28 -0600
References: <32C08861F246D411A8A900805FBE3F0CB30BD4@s99mail01.okdhs.org>

From: "Gumm, Jim"

> BTW, is $450 for a late German Tele-Elmarit-M 90 f2.8 a fair deal? I
have
> found and bought one for this price, had it sent second day air and
will see
> it very soon. Are the German lenses more desireable for this design?
How
> many versions of this lens are there? Fat, skinny, etc, its
confusing.
> Thanks in advance for the input. This group is unique and wonderful,
mostly,
> Jimbo


I have heard the later 2.8 is most desirable, but I love my skinny
Canadian TE.  It is barely bigger than double in length of my
Summicron 35mm, and it makes pretty pictures.

See:  http://www.sonc.com/jackson.htm

Regards,

Sonny
http://www.sonc.com



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Gumm, Jim" <Jim.Gumm@okdhs.org> ([Leica] RE: Noctilux)