Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Noctilux
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:27:29 -0800
References: <32C08861F246D411A8A900805FBE3F0CB30BD4@s99mail01.okdhs.org>

"Gumm, Jim" wrote:
><Snip> The Noctilux always amazes. Well, for its cost it had
> better.
> BTW, is $450 for a late German Tele-Elmarit-M 90 f2.8 a fair deal? I have
> found and bought one for this price, had it sent second day air and will see
> it very soon. Are the German lenses more desireable for this design? How
> many versions of this lens are there? Fat, skinny, etc, its confusing.
> Thanks in advance for the input. This group is unique and wonderful, mostly,
> Jimbo
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html



Thing is Jim, a new Noctilux costs the same as the new AF Canon F1 lens!

	and i didn't know you could get a Tele-Elmarit-M 90 f2.8 not made in Canada.


Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.markrabiner.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Gumm, Jim" <Jim.Gumm@okdhs.org> ([Leica] RE: Noctilux)