Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Which Photo magazines are good?
From: George Day <>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:05:55 -0800

That's a dead-on assessment.

on 11/30/01 11:37 AM, B. D. Colen at wrote:

> A while back there was, in fact, a column at the Digital Journalist
> website arguing that the Leica M and the Canon EOS were the ideal
> photojournalist combo - the M for use with wide angles and use in
> situations where near silence is required, the EOS for use with longer
> lenses, flash, and for getting in really close - where the Leica lenses
> won't focus.
> B. D.
> John David Emmett wrote:
>> National Geographic, of course.
>> Great photos. A few quotes in the back by photogs. Even some Leicas here
>> and there.
>> I just read the newest NPPA news photographer and thought that I'd
>> mention that John Lowenstein, magazine photog of the year, is pictured
>> with a Leica (and a Canon Eos with 70-200 slung over his shoulder.)
>> That's the second pro I've seen like that in a week. There was a post
>> about Frank Johnston's marine photo in Vietnam. A new photo shows
>> Johnston with a Leica to his eye and a Canon Eos with 70-200 slung over
>> his shoulder.
>> Mark Rabiner is probably pissing his Wheeties as we speak.
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, see
> --
> To unsubscribe, see

- --
To unsubscribe, see

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <> (Re: [Leica] Which Photo magazines are good?)