Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Photo Mgazines
From: "Bill Harting" <>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:43:14 -0500
References: <>

Double take is good at integrating photos into a general magazine,
definitely worth looking at. The only mag I subscribe to these days is

Bill Harting

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "warren allen" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:04 PM
Subject: [Leica] RE: Photo Mgazines

> Hi all,
>   I was just mulling this over in my head the past few weeks and I find
> great photo magazines. A couple ok, I like Lenswork for it's quaility but
> agree somewhat with the previous posters opinion. BlindSpot can have it's
> moments and I've found the best photo stories in here ( look for the back
> issue with the John Gotti snap shot) Aperture pricey and spotty in
> CameraArts too artsy for me. The rest I find ridiculuosly below average,
> more in bussiness to sell Canons tha promote photography.
>   Most of my frustration lies in the fact that magazines are built on
> photography! Why can there be one or two excellent journals out there that
> touch on contemporary ideas and occationally drop an old Winogrand
> interview. The golden age of photography for me being the 50's and 60's
> there are dozens of great talents that are completely overlooked, just the
> backlog of talent is enough to have an interesting quarterly and remind us
> about Lewis Baltz and help us forget Avedon.
> my 2 cents,
> --
> Warren Allen
> Whatrix designs
> --
> To unsubscribe, see

- --
To unsubscribe, see

Replies: Reply from "John R. Fulton Jr." <> (Re: [Leica] RE: Photo Mgazines)
In reply to: Message from warren allen <> ([Leica] RE: Photo Mgazines)