Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: If only one more R lens,
From: "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:39:44 -0600
References: <10e.8b1e024.2932fcbb@aol.com>

Seth sez:

> How about remembering that our friend has started with an R-3 and 50
> Summicron-R. Yes, add a 90 (2,8?) and maybe the 25/4 Voigtlander/Cosina. But
> why not suggest a second R-body, say an R-6.2 or R-7? The R-3 is a budget
> Japanese Leica one can buy mint/mint for $325.-375. Then $4,000. for a set of
> lenses for that single body? Hmmm.
>
> Seth    LaK 9


So, are you suggesting we should not use Leica lenses on our R3's?   Oh,  and does V
/C make a 25 f4 for the R?

My R3 says "Portugal" on the bottom, like so many other R's of various denominations.

Unless you are joking, and forgot the "smiley . . .  "

Hmmm, indeed.  What a confusing letter you write, Seth.

Regards,

Sonny
http://www.sonc.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from SthRosner@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Re: If only one more R lens,)