Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>I always use a tripod when I shoot my neutral gray card with a Summilux. >This allows me to use at f6.3 at 1/218th second, the optimum >non-light-falling-off aperture and the ideal shutter speed to avoid motion >blur. (Nothing worse than a blurry, dark cornered neutral gray card shot). You are certainly correct, Dave. And I for one praise your practical technique. If you want light falloff, you need to get a Noctilux. >Ever wonder why Leica offers a Summilux M? I know why! Because its heresy >to use a tripod with a Noctilux. Plus, it's so massive and heavy even the >stoutest Arca ball-head equiped Gitzo can't keep it from toppling >foward. Therefore, it must be hand held. >Dave Right you are again, Dave. I actualy had to furnish proof that I had sold all my tripods before my dealer would accept to sell me the Noctilux. He also pays to have an assistant follow me around when I use it to insure that I will only handhold the lens - I'm not even allowed to rest it on the roof of a car or on a child's head as I make exposures of my fleeting subjects against evenly lit, flat surfaces, the goal of which, of course, is to make full use of the 3 stops of light falloff in each of the four corners, which might otherwise go unnoticed. Guy >>According to Erwin ("Leica Lens Compendium," pp. 126-127), the Summilux >>wide open has more than 2 stops of "quite visible vignetting," so the whole >>frame is not that much more usable with that lens than it is with a >>Noctilux with its 3 stops of light falloff. > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html