Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"Leslie E. England" wrote: > > I was under the impression exhibitions demanded 16x20 enlargements. > Having just bought a new easel and spent the extra money for the 16x20 ><Snip> > We don't get exhibitions down here, and I'm ignorant. Does anyone > have any thoughts on the above questions? > > Lee England > Natchez, Mississippi > It's great to print big! Lee! I made an attempt to go 16x20 in the last months and have a new portfolio of prints in that size but I've had it. Back to the more humane 11x14 the size most of the shows I've seeen in the last year were in. And you can put them in your backpack. I'm had most of my shows 16x20 but a lot 11x14. One 5x7. I expect to have one in 20x24 in the next years I've set my darkroom up for that. I think an "artist" gets to decide what size his work should be. What size EACH PRINT should be. Some should be bigger than others some think. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA New Email address is rabiner2@home.com Website is http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/ - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html