Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] EOS out of running; now R8 vs. M - wife has spoken
From: David Rodgers <drodgers@swiftnet.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:50:58 -0800
References: <EC1D893EF5042348ADC8A79B742E9EFB283389@GCI-MOCEX01.us.ad.gannett.com>

Yet another reason I prefer to use prime lenses.

Dave

At 11:37 AM 11/15/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>Mitch,
>
>Because the front of the lens recess to much on some focal lenght.
>
>It's so stupid, specially when one knows that the old 35-70/3,5 was
>redesigned in 1988 in order to accept a polarizer.
>:-(
>
>Lucien
>
>"Zeissler, Mitch" wrote:
>
> > ???
> >
> > It isn't possible?  How can that be?
> >
> > /Mitch Zeissler
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lucien [mailto:director@ubi.edu]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:36 AM
> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] EOS out of running; now R8 vs. M - wife has spoken
> >
> > Mitch,
> >
> > I'll buy a Leica 35-70/4  the day it will be possible to use a polarizer
> > on
> > it.
> >
> > Not before.
> >
> > Lucien
> >
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Zeissler, Mitch" <mzeissle@gcipoa.gannett.com> (RE: [Leica] EOS out of running; now R8 vs. M - wife has spoken)