Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] EOS out of running; now R8 vs. M - wife has spoken
From: Lucien <director@ubi.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:37:39 +0100
References: <EC1D893EF5042348ADC8A79B742E9EFB283389@GCI-MOCEX01.us.ad.gannett.com>

Mitch,

Because the front of the lens recess to much on some focal lenght.

It's so stupid, specially when one knows that the old 35-70/3,5 was
redesigned in 1988 in order to accept a polarizer.
:-(

Lucien

"Zeissler, Mitch" wrote:

> ???
>
> It isn't possible?  How can that be?
>
> /Mitch Zeissler
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucien [mailto:director@ubi.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:36 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] EOS out of running; now R8 vs. M - wife has spoken
>
> Mitch,
>
> I'll buy a Leica 35-70/4  the day it will be possible to use a polarizer
> on
> it.
>
> Not before.
>
> Lucien
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Zeissler, Mitch" <mzeissle@gcipoa.gannett.com> (RE: [Leica] EOS out of running; now R8 vs. M - wife has spoken)