Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi! I'm glad to hear such praise for your new equipment! (I wouldn't say I expected it to be that way - or else - - - ;-) Maybe I'd say you've got a good minilab in your vicinity! ;-) ) Martin > Hello everyone. > > I've been following some of the threads in lurk mode for a few weeks > now. Photography has been a passion for some 30 years now. I've used > many systems over the years and have loved them all. To this day I still > get a warm and fuzzy handling a nice piece of equipment, and feel a > child's enthusiasm when picking up prints from the local lab. > > Having recently sold some items that I was no longer using and a few > that I had collected, I was left with a substantial sum of money. (Ebay > isn't that bad) What to do? "You know I've always wanted a Leica M > system." But all the controversy you read about the cost. Is it worth > it? Well as I have done many times in my life I closed my eyes and threw > my money at the system. M6TTL, 35 Summicron ASPH, 50 Elmar (I always > thought this was a cool lens) and a 90 Summicron APO ASPH. > > Prior to the M system I'd been using Nikon F5 with all the newer optics, > mostly high end zooms, and a few specialty primes. I find no faults with > the Nikon system other than its bulk and weight. The results I've gotten > have been amazing. Recently I sold a G1 system that I had used for > travel. Mainly because I didn't like the focus noise or the problematic > focusing of the 90. I think that Contax really missed the boat by not > making this system a true manual focus. > > For work (construction) I am lost without digital. (Nikon 995) The > camera has saved me quite a bit of money. You can't argue with an image. > I did dislike carrying it due to battery needs but have resolved that > problem through the use of a sealed lead acid battery from an emergency > backup exit sign. So now I carry it a little more often. For recording > events it's not a bad system. > > Back to the M6. Yesterday I picked up some prints I had dropped off a > few days ago. Two rolls from my daughters T2, not a bad camera for a ten > year old. :-) I've tried to teach her the use of a manual camera but she > isn't ready yet. Her composition is good though. Two rolls were from my > F5 with 17-35 F2.8, and lastly one roll from the M6 with the 35 > Summicron ASPH. I started out with the T2 prints, then the F5, and > finally the M6. The T2 prints were good, the F5 prints were excellent, > and the M6 prints were....I'm at a loss of words. Is this the "glow" > everyone talks about? I'm amazed! The prints just popped out at you. > I've never seen anything like it. The first time using the camera and I > get results like this? OK, so the first thing through my mind is weather > my mind is justifying the cost. So I ask the president of the household > to pass judgment. What does she pick? The M6 prints. "These are > beautiful". Still at a loss of words I guess I'll have to shoot more > film. :-) > > And finally a question. Can I get a little feed back on the 24 Elmarit > ASPH and the 21 Elmarit ASPH? Likes and dislikes are welcomed. > > Thanks and sorry about the length of the post. > > Sam Krneta > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html