Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Yeah - I see it now when Jim explained it - but are the images with top quality lenses inferior? > All the best! > Raimo Not inferior, just unnecessary If you'll get similar output from a Canon 28-80 Lens at $99 as you can get from their 28-70 at $1000, then why buy the big one? Sonny > Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen > > -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- > Lähettäjä: SonC (Sonny Carter) <sonc@sonc.com> > Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Päivä: 06. marraskuuta 2001 19:26 > Aihe: [Leica] Re: Digital Dreams (not) lengthy > > > >Ramio, > >I'm not a digi-xpert by any means, but I know several guys who're > >shooting with the Nikon and Canon SLRs. They report they're using the > >cheaper consumer lenses on these, because the high-end glass just > >doesn't show up in their images. The lighter, cheaper lenses work > >just as well, because you're not using the edges if the glass anyhow. > >Multi-grand US$ for a camera, and $200 for the lens, and oh yes, a > >$2000 laptop to edit with. > > > >Regards, > > > >Sonny > >http://www.sonc.com > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html