Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Digital Dreams (not) lengthy
From: "SonC (Sonny Carter)" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 14:39:15 -0600
References: <005801c16705$b986c840$6e04a5c3@default>

> Yeah - I see it now when Jim explained it - but are the images with
top quality lenses inferior?
> All the best!
> Raimo

Not inferior, just unnecessary  If you'll get similar output from a
Canon 28-80 Lens at $99 as you can get from their 28-70 at $1000, then
why buy the big one?

Sonny






> Personal photography homepage at
http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
>
> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
> Lähettäjä: SonC (Sonny Carter) <sonc@sonc.com>
> Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
<leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Päivä: 06. marraskuuta 2001 19:26
> Aihe: [Leica] Re: Digital Dreams (not) lengthy
>
>
> >Ramio,
> >I'm not a digi-xpert by any means, but I know several guys who're
> >shooting with the Nikon and Canon SLRs.  They report they're using
the
> >cheaper consumer lenses on these, because the high-end glass just
> >doesn't show up in their images.  The lighter, cheaper lenses work
> >just as well, because you're not using the edges if the glass
anyhow.
> >Multi-grand US$ for a camera, and $200 for the lens, and oh yes, a
> >$2000 laptop to edit with.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Sonny
> >http://www.sonc.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Digital Dreams (not) lengthy)
In reply to: Message from "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi> (Vs: [Leica] Re: Digital Dreams (not) lengthy)