Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: the 90% rule-long, rambling BS from Walt
From: Martins Zelmenis <martin@lrpv.lv>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:10:38 +0200
References: <SIMEON.10111021309.A@sova-walt.unt.edu> <007001c16430$831231a0$a02d0dce@g4s5g1>

Thank you for this posting! Now I know I'm not alone!

Marin


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Todoroff" <datamaster@humboldt1.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: sestdiena, 2001. gada 3. novembri 8:25
Subject: [Leica] Re: the 90% rule-long, rambling BS from Walt


> Well before my first Leica, I saw the difference daily as a darkroom
printer
> in Sweden's largest publishing company. Some negatives under the Focomat
IIc
> enlarger had a unique sharpness and range of contrast. It was as if there
> were more shades of gray in the negative. As I began to associate negs
with
> photographers and cameras, that "look", I discovered, was from Leicas. Of
> course, those were lenses of 35 years ago, but it is the reason I still
have
> Leicas and not Nikons today.
>
> Gary Todoroff
> Tree LUGger
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Walter S Delesandri <walt@jove.acs.unt.edu> (Re: [Leica] the 90% rule-long, rambling BS from Walt)
Message from "Gary Todoroff" <datamaster@humboldt1.com> ([Leica] Re: the 90% rule-long, rambling BS from Walt)