Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
> Ted wrote
>
> > I wondered if you meant >>> " crisper, sharper, contrasty etc etc" as
> all being positive adjectives in complimenting the image, as opposed to:
the
> "better photos"<<< which implies a better photo as in content.
Am I correct in this assumption?<<<<<<<
George responded:
> Yes you are Ted, although I did not use any of those positive
> adjectives.
> The photos were equally strong and of very similar characters. See link
> http://www.georgeweir.com/pages/George-Weir-Personal_285.html
> n.b. these scans are from a fotovix so images are not as neat looking as
> prints.<<<<<
It's a tough call and I rarely do this on a computer monitor, however here
goes and heaven help me if I'm wrong, as I'll never hear the end of this
one! ;-)
Here goes... Leica? the second one ... kid in dark shirt and baseball cap?
the other is the Nikon? Why? There appears to be a sharper look to the
shirt and overall contrast effect compared to the first on with boy in white
shirt.
Oh Lordy lordy let me be right! :-)
ted
Ted Grant Photography Limited
www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html