Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Ted wrote > > > I wondered if you meant >>> " crisper, sharper, contrasty etc etc" as > all being positive adjectives in complimenting the image, as opposed to: the > "better photos"<<< which implies a better photo as in content. Am I correct in this assumption?<<<<<<< George responded: > Yes you are Ted, although I did not use any of those positive > adjectives. > The photos were equally strong and of very similar characters. See link > http://www.georgeweir.com/pages/George-Weir-Personal_285.html > n.b. these scans are from a fotovix so images are not as neat looking as > prints.<<<<< It's a tough call and I rarely do this on a computer monitor, however here goes and heaven help me if I'm wrong, as I'll never hear the end of this one! ;-) Here goes... Leica? the second one ... kid in dark shirt and baseball cap? the other is the Nikon? Why? There appears to be a sharper look to the shirt and overall contrast effect compared to the first on with boy in white shirt. Oh Lordy lordy let me be right! :-) ted Ted Grant Photography Limited www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html