Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like'em because they're small, they're super-quiet, they force you to be at least somewhat creative with every exposure and they take damn nice pictures when you point them at the right thing. on 11/2/01 2:29 PM, Mārtiņš Zelmenis at martin@lrpv.lv wrote: > > May I suggest you work on your negatives just a weeny bit more?? The > difference emerges under certain circumstances. > > Yours > > Martin > > > I have a desire to get flamed. > Leicas DO NOT make better pictures than "acceptable" equipment by ANY > other maker. I've used IT ALL. I've said for years, buy Leica FOR OTHER > REASONS (feel, pride, compactness, reliability or at least 'repairability', > low light focusing with WAs, etc....)...NOT for "results". > > Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Minolta, Konica, etc....TAKE THE SAME PICTURES. > > Even Erwin states (if somewhat cryptically) that the ONLY way to > see the superiority of this glass is to use a tripod, VERY slow transparency > film, speeds that don't shake the camera, etc... > If I felt that Cosina gear was built for the 'long' haul, and would remain > supported by the maker in 25 years, I'd have NO problem switching. > If Nikon had brought out an SP for the price of the M6, I'd already be > using it. (the real thing, not some plastic imitation). > > If you're holding your Leica in your hands, using it in a 'real world' > manner, > with 'real world' films, then you might as well use a nikon or canon--if > you're > worried about "quality" > I've NO > doubt that current Ni/Ca/Oly lenses are as good or better than my 60s-80s > Leica lenses. But I >>>>LIKE<<<< my Leicas (and my Nikons!)...and I'll > continue > to pay through the ass to use them. > > An "Epiphone" guitar is NOT a Gibson....but I'll be damned if anyone other > than me in the bar can tell....Period....give it 20 years, and like Leica, > there MIGHT be a difference in the way they hold up....but who knows?... > If ya'll are into this, I have a new "1958" Fender Deluxe clone (amplifier) > It's built so it's roadworthy, and will hold up better than the real thing > EVER would have, even new.....but it's NOT the same as a ragged, torn up, > cigarette burned 1958 amp...--to me (I have a real '60 vibrolux)...but for > my "user" ,it's perfect...throw it in the van, leave the bar with it on > the stage (might get stolen?)...etc....I don't have to WORRY about it... > That's the way I'd look at the Cosina/Konica/etc....throw it in the trunk > and don't worry...(that's where my 1970 M4 is now....if it gets hot I'll > have to go get it out of there!!) > > If pride of ownership, feel, longevity, is important to you (YES!!!!), and > IF > you think more and make better pictures with it,(YES!!!!) -- then buy > Leica... > it's the best...not as good as it was 30 years ago, but what is? > > Walt > > > > > > On Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:03:50 -0800 kyle cassidy <kcassidy@asc.upenn.edu> > wrote >>> A rhetorical question - how many of us would be better off with equipment >> that's 90% as >>> good as our Leicas, spending the difference on film and/or time spent >> photographing? >> >> i've been tellin' ya folks.... now repeat the spell after me: " ... >> jupiter-12, cosina and a bulk roll, >> canon serenar, ql-17, use the rest to bribe the models to rug down...." >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html