Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan, What's insane is for any body to try to make too much out of a bench test. Especially when, as you say, we know little or nothing about the criteria behind it. Better to shoot film, or to ask photographers who have actually used various lenses. That to me holds far more credibility. Dave At 05:50 AM 11/1/2001 +0100, you wrote: >Ray, > >It is impossible to evaluate test results unless you know the criteria >used. On the face of it, rating the 50mm higher than the 35mm seems insane. >I have both of these lenses. The 35mm is clearly better than the 50mm in >terms of sharpness, detail, flare suppresion. This is not to say that the >50mm is bad, it is outstanding, but the 35mm is even more outstanding. If >Photodo gets an opposite result, then I can only conclude that either their >methodology is flawed or someone made a mistake reporting the results. > >Nathan - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html