Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]3-M4-2, 1-M4-P Not all at the same time, over a 25 year span. One M4-2 had counter problem---no parts needed--- One M4-2 came (used) with broken sync block (plastic, cheap piece of shit) M4-P CAME in original box with RF out of adjustment. All had periodic RF adjustment (cat dragged on floor off desk, etc) first two used with motor, professionally....others used sporadically All, including current M4-P, performed FLAWLESSLY other than as noted, and both "defective" M4-2s were bought used and cheap because of existing flaws. All said, damn fine cameras... My M4 still looks and feels better, as did my M3. Walt On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:14:48 +0100 leica@davidmorton.org wrote: > Roland Smith wrote: > > "I have two M4-2s that perform well for me. I must be doing something > wrong." > > Me too, my M4-2 works perfectly. However mine was virtually re-built at > Solms a couple of years ago (for an *absurdly* low price), so it's hardly > representative of the breed. > > Frankly any M4-2 that's still going strong now either never had production > problems or has had them all fixed in the 20+ years it's been working. > > -- > David Morton > dmorton@journalist.co.uk > > "The more opinions you have, the less you see." -- Wim Wenders. > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html