Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 10/18/01 12:14:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time, owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us writes: > A digital "M" would surely come from that same mind-set. No "built-in" sepia > toning and stuff, no "on board" DSP. No zillion exposure modes. No changes > in the focusing mechanism. Just a shift in sensor and the ability to slot in > a memory card or (as important) a microdrive and a way to look at the image > you've recorded and a FireWire connector to get data out of the camera. - -------------------------------------------------- A Leica digital wouldn't be an M6. It would be a DG 1; that is, a manual digital in which film would be replaced by a 24x36 pixel element array. It wouldn't be AF, would use standard Leica lenses. It would have a high resolution screen on the back, and would be housed in a metal body. And it would recycle instantly. As fast as film is handled in the M6. Of course, that would be my idea of a true digital Leica. Which I would use seldom, I might add. Without a negative, it isn't true photography as far as I'm concerned. Film is the RESET button of photography. Digital can never have such a function. Burning an image into a CD isn't equivalent to a negative because the inevitable artifacts of the digital process must inherently intrude. A digital image is always too good to be true. And the public will understand that caveat. br - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html