Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I realize that as a first year law student I only know enough to be really dangerous, so I humbly ask that any lawyer/photographer who chooses to answer this question be gentle with me. When a lab limits damages to replacement film with some clause they write on the back of your receipt, would this be considered a liquidated damages clause? If so, do US courts generally uphold them? I guess I'm thinking that while the damages are hard to estimate, adding nothing to the value of the raw unexposed film doesn't sound like a fair estimate of something hard to estimate to me. TIA Simon Stevens Ted wrote: >Lawyers and great arguments will not likely get you anywhere, maybe two >rolls instead of one, but that's it. >Every and any lab I've had process film have a disclaimer somewhere on their >packaging or hanging on the wall as notification of ... "we accept no >responsibility for damage to the film etc etc etc" - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html