Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dans un courrier daté du 09/10/01 02:12:23 Paris, Madrid (heure d'été), barney.quinn@noaa.gov a écrit : > Hi, > > Either would be a great choice for a lens. I'd go with silver on silver, but > that is a matter of taste. The light rays going through the lens ain't ever > going to know the dirference. > > Barney > > Michael S. Yoder wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > I'm new to the list, so I don't know if this question has been asked > > (please accept my apologies if it has.) My new M6 TTL will be purchased > > within 30 days. While researching which lens to start out with, a > question > > crossed my mind: > > > > Are there fundamentally any differences (mechanical, durability, etc.) > > between the silver and black versions of lenses? I notice from their > > literature that in all cases where both finishes are offered, the silver > > version weighs more. Are they made in the same place? > > > > I'm most likely going to start with the silver M6 (.72 viewfinder) and the > > 35 F2 Summicron Asph. for shooting architecture and urban/suburban > > landscapes. Probably a silver version would look nicer? > > > > Thanks. > > Best to all, > > Michael Barney , the light reys won't know the diff. , but the poeple you shoot will surely notice that the chrome version screems : I'm here ! The black version is the F117 of the Leicas ! Jo Goodtimes , France - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html