Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I've been struggling with this since getting a Leica SLR. As far as I can tell, the break point for me is at 90mm. 50mm is almost always better on the M3 (easier to focus and compose). 90MM is usually better on the SLR (particularly up close), but better on the M3 in low light or when you want to see what's outside the lens coverage. Why do you feel that a SLR is better at 50mm? Mike B. D. Colen wrote: > I am one who doesn't think there is any question that a > reflex is better for virtually any and every lens above 35 mm, BUT, > there is no question there are times one absolutely needs the near > silence and lack of vibration the M offers. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html