Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Steve, > I do agree with you re. the LACK of eye contact. Generally, not always, it > seems to indicate complicity on behalf of > the subject. O.K. if that's what one wants, But I believe, and it seems you > may too, that genuine candid/street pics > look more real when the subject does not appear to be aware of and > 'performs' for the camera. > I feel a rumble in the tribe already, but that is just my P.O.V. > I am not a dedicated streetshooter, but I feel now that I have flagged an > opinion on which I am not an expert, I > should back my view up with a pic or two. Maybe I will set that as my next PAW! > BTW I don't mind the part person on the extreme LHS. It sort of rediects > the image back into itself which otherwise > would have pointed out of frame. > Cheers all, > JohnA > > John Amiet > Melbourne, AUSTRALIA > Email. jeapic@operamail.com > > Thanks John. Street photography is so varied and subjective I think there is no right or wrong. The really good stuff will jump out and bonk you over the head--someday, with luck, I may get one of those bonk pictures. sl - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html