Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is my first attempt to join your group discussion and I hope you will be as encouraging to me as you have been to each other. I bought my first camera in Dec. 1956. It took 90% of my hard savings from my bank as I was only a student then. That camera was the Leica M3. Ever since, I had been a Leicaphile and had also gone into the R series. The Leicas had been a great comfort and joy for a shy young man that I was and that was the only expression I could give myself. Over the years I had drifted away to Canonflex, then Nikon etc. but in my heart of hearts, Leica has always been my one and only love. It still is, otherwise, I would NOT be here. Recently, I am using quite a lot of EOS and its L series of lenses. I found that synchro-sun is very easy with this system. In contrast, I felt disappointed with Leica in its research and development on 'flash' technology. Whenever I see a Leica agent visiting the shop I frequented, I always make it be known of my needs and disappointment on flash technology with the Leicas hoping that he will feed the Leica with such sentiments. Leica, to me can solve any problem. They have the know-how except perhaps how the make things more economically-viable. I am sure, the M series could do with higher synchro speed in a mechanical shutter than what it is offered to the market. Such low synchro speed is way behind time. The R8, have this ROM system just for flash. I do not see any advantage of this with regard to its cost. Perhaps, this has been discussed by this forum. If it had, please let me know the website so that I can visit. If not, please explain to this old man the logic and the advantage of such a step. The flash, SF20, is such a small and simplied unit for a system using ROM built into the lenses. What is the explanation? I know, LUGs believe in natural light photography. I am also a believer of this but surely Leica must be abreast with time. It is way behind in this technology (compared with Nikon, Canon and Minolta etc). Synchro-sun is also used by lots of people. I write this not as a complaint but to learn what you LUGs know and also as an appeal that Leica would catch up in this technology. Thank you and look forward to your constructive comments. Eng - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html