Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I couldn't let this one go by. My Leica interest came as a need to repalce my Canon FD system. I started with the EOS-1 which couldn't really replace my F-1n. Fanally, the R8 and its family of lenses has found my wallet. As a result I own an FD 300mmf2.8L, an EF 300mmf2.8L and the Leica 280mm f2.8 APO-Telyt. Also the local paper where I work has the Nikon 300mmf2.8 AF-EDIF. So, I am very familiar with 4 of the 300f2.8's in actual and extensive use. Note: the Leica is the non-modular.) The Leica is very much the best of the lot. It has very good definition (wide open) and excellant sharpness. The Canon and Nikon exhibit much more contrast. Initially, looking at negatives, the Canon and Nikon "appear" to have better structure, but its the higher contrast. The Leica is superb with its close focus ability and knurled focus ring. The next best lens is the Canon FD 300mmf2.9L. I find the image quality very close to the Leica but with a pronounced increase in contrast. This has been one of my favorite lenses for years and it has never let me down. Just lovely! I find the Nikon to be just about as good as the FD 300f2.8L Canon. Very similar without the good feel and balance of the Canon. The EF Canon 300mmf2.8L has superb handling but the images are definetly not as good as the other three. Still a pretty good lens though. The Leica 280mm f2.8 APO-Telyt is a superb lens! Regards, Dave Strang dstrang@up.net