Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/09/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Darkroom Mystery
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 11:57:49 -0700
References: <200109070104.SAA15606@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <3B98D94E.4C083032@uni.edu> <004401c137b2$496a63a0$6afa0441@laurelhome> <040301c137be$8b54f800$56234d18@gv.shawcable.net> <OE60yKdw0bPur9gSRp900003e17@hotmail.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20010907152602.024f5530@AXCS13.cos.agilent.com> <v04011700b7c01edf7c86@[66.81.37.130]>
I think it was Ilford. An inconsistency in the batch. It happens. Less with
Kodak but Ilford makes far better black and white papers in most peoples opinion.
Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon
USA
http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
In reply to:
Message from matt kollasch <matthew.kollasch@uni.edu> ([Leica] Private property and buildings)
Message from "Jim Laurel" <JimLaurel@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Private property and buildings)
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Private property and buildings)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Private property and buildings)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Private property and buildings)
Message from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> ([Leica] Darkroom Mystery)