Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This seems to be my own experience - and 90/2.8 currently is my only lens for my R7, so thank you for the information - now I know I'm not going to experiment with the 90/2! Thank you! Martin >Only in this particular case, as the 90mm R 'cron is a real dog, even by >Leica standards. Over my lifetime I only had three 'crons, 2 M and 1 R, >they all were pathetic wide open and at F2.8. At F4 the images were >somewhat passable. My last generation 90R F2.8 beats them hands down in >just about all the applications I've put it through. > >S. Dimitrov > > >Pablo Kolodny wrote: >> >> Seriously ? >> I have understood that all 'Crons were better performers than Elmarits. >> That's new to my records. >> Every day I learn some thing new. >> >> thanks >> >> -- >> Pablo Kolodny >> www.pablokolodny.com >> >> > From: Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> >> > Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> > Date: 5 Sep 2001 08:44:29 -0700 >> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> > Subject: Re: [Leica] practical question - or should it be saved for Friday? >> > >> > Otherwise the Elmarit-R's optical qualities are superior to the Summicron-R