Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:lightest possible travelling outfit
From: "John R. Fulton Jr." <JRFjr@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:25:25 -0500
References: <3.0.3.32.20010831191927.006fcc04@pop.asiaonline.net> <p05100300b7b52e6f09dd@[206.175.239.9]> <3B8F97F7.5B77223@earthlink.net>

Hi BD--
You are so right.
I was just trying to be helpful and offer some advice. I'm new to the 
forum so forgive me.
Best regards,
John


>
>Actually, John, that's all YOU need. But what you want or need really
>has little to do with the shooting needs and preferences of someone
>else. If I could take only one lense, it would be a 35. Two, would
>probably be a 28 and 35. Three would probably be a 21, 28 and 35. Four
>would be a 21, 28, 35 and 90. At five, I'd add the 50 you consider
>essential. Different people have different shooting styles.
>
>B. D.

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re:lightest possible travelling outfit)
In reply to: Message from Cummer Family <cummer@asiaonline.net> ([Leica] Re:lightest possible travelling outfit)
Message from "John R. Fulton Jr." <JRFjr@compuserve.com> ([Leica] Re:lightest possible travelling outfit)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re:lightest possible travelling outfit)