Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] more normal? hardly (new deadman pix)
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@home.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 22:33:11 -0600
References: <B7A2114D.22C1%john@pinkheadedbug.com>

Enjoyed the pics of Ed's 87th bash.

Send Lastman out west and we'll put him in a pot!

Regards,

Greg J. Lorenzo
Calgary, Alberta

Johnny Deadman wrote:
> 
> sick of my panoramas? check out this stuff from Honest Ed Mirvish's 87th
> birthday party which I reported on a month ago. It will make you yearn for
> the normality of distorted 360 degree panoramas.
> 
>     http://www.pinkheadedbug.com/portfolios/mirvish/index.html
> 
> most of this stuff was shot I am ashamed to say (yeah, right) on my Canon
> T90 with a off-brand 24mm lens, but some of it is the 28 on the Leica and
> maybe even one or two on the 35.
> 
> shooting with the T90 is very different from shooting with the Leica, not
> least because it goes BANG CLICK WHIIIIIRRRRR, at which point people ask you
> which newspaper you are with. However the camera is a total pleasure to use.
> I keep it on manual.
> 
> I found the 24 on the T90 *far* easier to use than the 25 skopar on the
> Leica. I can't bear not being able to focus even at f/11 on a 24, and the
> skopar viewfinder is ridiculously inaccurate. I guess I should try a 24
> Elmarit and a Leica vf one of these days.
> 
> The Leica images are of course much sharper up close but I was yearning for
> a 24 that day and the T90 was the only solution.
> 
> bouquets/brickbats welcome
> 
> --
> John Brownlow
> 
> http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
> 
> ICQ: 109343205

In reply to: Message from Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com> ([Leica] more normal? hardly (new deadman pix))