Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Tri-X 320...extended sensitivity in the shadows? Was- RE:[Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V20 #217
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 18:01:47 -0400
References: <3B6DB69E.B8468A2C@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

Actually, I always get the best shot on the final frame of 35mm film I've
rolled myself, where the film was exposed to light at the end where it was
attached to the spool.  And I know it's true because occasionally I can
actually see part of the frame when I develop the film!

dan c.

At 06:46 PM 05-08-01 -0300, Pablo Kolodny wrote:
>
>Lots of times when working in Studio, let's say for a dance job where we
>plan in advance every shot and ask for the dancers to move themselves like
>this or like that way, we achieve the best shot at the 13th frame when using
>120 and at the 25th when 220.-

Replies: Reply from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] that pesky 37th frame on home loaded 35mm film)
Reply from Rich Lahrson <tripspud@transbay.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Tri-X 320...extended sensitivity in theshadows? Was- RE:[Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V20 #217)
In reply to: Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: Tri-X 320...extended sensitivity in the shadows? Was- RE: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V20 #217)