Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Re: Subject: RE: Leica Quality versus Medium Format
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 17:02:57 -0700
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010803142952.0222c7b0@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20010803161202.02167cf0@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>

Jim Brick wrote:
> 
> At 05:58 PM 8/3/01 -0400, Austin Franklin wrote:
> 
> >Plus a few extra of them double loop lousy backs...plus a cheeseburger...and
> >a diet coke...make that a case of diet coke...
> 
> Ix-nay on the Diet Coke. Only fat people drink "diet" drinks. Ever notice?
> 
> It must not work!
> 
> I don't think you are fat Austin. So you can't have "diet" coke!
> 
> I have four "E" backs. Two 220 and two 120. Lousy things!

The typical traditional definition of a photographers assistant?
Someone who knows how to load a Hasselblad back.
I doubt that's changed much.


Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon
USA

http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/

Replies: Reply from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] RE: Re: Subject: RE: Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
In reply to: Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Subject: RE: Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] RE: Re: Subject: RE: Leica Quality versus Medium Format)