Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Subject: RE: Leica Quality versus Medium Format
From: Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 14:37:00 -0700
References: <200108022032.NAA09561@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <000f01c11bf6$e2bcbfd0$907ba8c0@lap1>
 
At 11:42 AM 8/3/01 -0700, Rich Lahrson wrote:

>That double back film path on the
>'Blad, Bronica, Contax, Mamays, etc. is no good.
>
>                                                     Cheers,
>
>
>Rich Lahrson


Yeah, I know. That's why my 50"x50" prints look so lousy. Must be the 
double-backed film.

And why the majority (easily 99%) of professional MF photographers use the 
Hasselblad, Mamiya, Bronica, & Contax. Heavy on the Hasselblad.

Terrible system.

Wouldn't own one.

Two is a minimum.

Jim
Replies: Reply from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] RE: Re: Subject: RE: Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
 In reply to: Message from "kyounts" <ojingoh@sitespecific.net> (Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)