Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Light in the darkroom?
From: Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 22:12:34 -0700
References: <3B657EB0.C549C3AA@uni.edu> <3B65FBE5.5C7F07D7@sympatico.ca> <3B660374.192FEE7B@earthlink.net>

Optically superior in that the wavelengths produced are closer to natural
light, perhaps?
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <belinkoff@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Light in the darkroom?


> Bernard Cousineau wrote:
>
> > Verilux bulbs (http://www.verilux.net).
> > [...] overpriced, longer lasting, and
> > optically a few notches above.
>
> Could you explain how one light bulb can be  optical superior to
> another?  What characteristic should we be looking for?  Sounds like
> nonsense to me.
> --
> Shel Belinkoff
> mailto:belinkoff@earthlink.net
> "Why should I use a meter?  What if the darn thing broke on me
> when I was out making a photograph? Then what would I do?"

In reply to: Message from Matt Kollasch <matthew.kollasch@uni.edu> ([Leica] Light in the darkroom?)
Message from Bernard Cousineau <flatbroke@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Light in the darkroom?)
Message from Shel Belinkoff <belinkoff@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Light in the darkroom?)