Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Bokeh-google search
From: "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:25:22 -0500
References: <200107240907.FAA29688@tigercat.pwj.com> <3B5D74FE.B392DD19@earthlink.net> <001701c11446$3c95c8c0$88e595ac@nsula.edu> <004b01c11497$2827d1c0$93b360d1@alice> <00af01c114b1$3dc3e5e0$04448bac@h7d9o5>
 
RG my google search revealed VASTLY different results.

Bokeh 2,700
Olympus  1,110,000
Nikon 771,000
Leica 213,000
Pentax 293,000
Contax 86,900
Hasselblad 60,800
Mamiya 67,300

Regards,

SonC

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "r g" <photos@nyc.rr.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh.. bah!


> I use google.com as the "great leveller" in determining correlations.
> Throughly circumstantial but renders the idea that bokeh is a semantic
leica
> construction a spurious argument.
>
> Bokeh 3030 pages total.
> Olympus 1060, Nikon 888, Canon 753, Leica 654, Pentax 512, Tamron 469,
> Contax 435, Hasselblad 210, Mamiya    190
>
> rg
>
In reply to: Message from shino@ubspainewebber.com (Re: [Leica] digital M)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] digital M)
Message from "SonC (Sonny Carter)" <SonC@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] digital M)
Message from "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com> (Re: [Leica] digital M)
Message from "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] "film look" effects)