Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mike, I don't like the effects they made, but I have seen stuff made with that look not too long ago on some TV series... looks yukky. Like the time I bought a new Angenieux 9.5-57 zoom for the Aaton, and an art director pulled out some black panty hose to put over the lens to give it a soft effect...... (sigh) Regards, SonC > I always hated those "film look" effects. When I shot (movie) film it was > razor-sharp and, with modern emulsions, virtually grainless when transferred > to video. Dynamic range that video never could match too! > > Mike D > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "SonC (Sonny Carter)" <SonC@sonc.com> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:40 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] digital M > > > > > > > Mark Rabiner > > > > > > > > for a true collection of digital darkroom effects i want > > > > ground-in dust spots, linear and random scratches, the > > distinctive > > > > > > i-opened-the-camera-back-by-mistake-and-slammed-it-quickly-s > > hut-sprocket-hole > > > > fog effect, the fixer-stained fingerprint effect (you > > can supply your > > > > own fingerprints) the and the infamous magnified > > i-stepped-on-the-neg > > > > adidas treadmarks! > > > > Mark, several years ago our production operation had a video > > editor that ran off the Amiga computer. The Editor was > > called the "Video Toaster," and it had an effect called > > "film look." This effect would take video, soften it, and > > insert dust and scratches. The year was 1993, I think. > > > > Regards, > > SonC > > > >