Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user
From: "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:13:53 -0400
References: <2398703A010C0160@smtp-gate.mottmac.com> <3B59A420.AD9F700@sympatico.ca> <3B5C6A7B.9C208DC4@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

Lenses for Arri etc. cost five grand and up each too!  That's for primes.
Puts some of ours in perspective.

Mike D

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user


> ><Snip>
> >
> > I vaguely recall reading an interview with David Lynch in American
Cinematographer in which he mentionned that he had purchased a Panaflex, so
one may actually be able to pull some strings and get one, given the right
connections.
> > People have the same reaction towards my Arri BL16, b.t.w. The other
common reaction is "now that looks like a real movie camera..."
> >
> > Bernard
>
> I got a catalog from Arri and most of them cost more than my house and
that is
> not an exaggeration.
> !
> Mark Rabiner
>
> Portland, Oregon
> USA
>
> http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
>

Replies: Reply from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)
In reply to: Message from Malcolm McCullough <MM4@mm-croy.mottmac.com> ([Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)
Message from Bernard Cousineau <flatbroke@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)