Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user
From: "Tourtelot" <tourtelot@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 18:09:43 -0700
References: <2398703A010C0160@smtp-gate.mottmac.com> <3B59A420.AD9F700@sympatico.ca> <001201c11211$5c598840$6801a8c0@edmnds1.wa.home.com> <006a01c11243$29b32680$33b960d1@alice>

I have gotta say though, that when I take a close look at a Platinum, in it
beats the true heart of a Leica.  I have never seen anything as wonderfully
machined and built as that movie camera.  But for just under $1M (with a
10-1 Primo zoom, of course)  what do you expect?  And it also true that a
few people DO own Panaflex cameras, but they are very rare.  On the other
hand, 1st camera assistants believe THEY "own" Panaflex cameras and get VERY
miffed if their particular babies(even more so with prime lenses!) are
rented out to someone else <ggg>.

D.

We sound men DO own our gear and don't rent it out.  That way we keep all
our toys for ourselves <g>.


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user


> The mags don't fall off the NPR either if you put them on right and lower
> the safety catch!  <gg>
>
> But it is true that the BL, NPR, and for that matter the Panaflex ARE real
> movie cameras!  In the same way that the Leica is a REAL camera.
>
> Mike D
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tourtelot" <tourtelot@earthlink.net>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 2:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user
>
>
> > At least the mags don't fall off the BL <g>.
> >
> > D.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bernard Cousineau" <flatbroke@sympatico.ca>
> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 8:47 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user
> >
> >
> > > Malcolm McCullough wrote:
> > > >At least
> > > > if they come up and say 'Hey, you're using a Panaflex, I've got a
> > Platinum
> > > > actually' you know they are telling porkies*. For the other NPR**
> users
> > in
> > > > the LUG (I know you are out there) how many times do you hear 'Does
> that
> > > > thing still work?'
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Malcolm
> > > > *porkies = pork pies = lies; Cockney rhyming slang, widely used by
> > > > non-Cockneys. Panaflex cameras are only, to the best of my
knowledge,
> > > > available for hire. On topic - Leica make some of the lenses.
> > > > ** NPR = Eclair Noiseless Portable Reflex 16 mm camera introduced in
> > 1960.
> > > > Many are still going strong.
> > >
> > > Malcolm,
> > >
> > > I vaguely recall reading an interview with David Lynch in American
> > Cinematographer in which he mentionned that he had purchased a Panaflex,
> so
> > one may actually be able to pull some strings and get one, given the
right
> > connections.
> > > People have the same reaction towards my Arri BL16, b.t.w. The other
> > common reaction is "now that looks like a real movie camera..."
> > >
> > > Bernard
> >
> >
>

In reply to: Message from Malcolm McCullough <MM4@mm-croy.mottmac.com> ([Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)
Message from Bernard Cousineau <flatbroke@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)
Message from "Tourtelot" <tourtelot@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)
Message from "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com> (Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)