Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Simon Lamb wrote: > > Does anyone have any opinion/real world experience of the merits of using > Neopan at its rated speed versus Delta 3200 rated at 1600. For me, 1600 doesn't work well with D3200. Shadows seem to thin for my liking. I shoot it at 1250 in 120. Neopan looks pretty good, and I would prefer it over D3200 even though the grain has been a bit bigger. It's sharp, and has a nice look. I think Neopan is sharper then D3200. Having said that, I've settled on TMAX 3200 in DD-X at 1600. The least grain of the 3, sharp, good shadow detail, and still a little underexposure leeway. (I hate thin negs.) tv