Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Fuji Neopan 1600 vs Ilford Delta 3200 @ 1600
From: "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:00:38 +0100
References: <NBBBIDNIGLFOKNLJCPLHMELLGJAA.ddh@home.com>
 
Does anyone have any opinion/real world experience of the merits of using
Neopan at its rated speed versus Delta 3200 rated at 1600.  Usual things
such as contrast, sharpness, degree of grain etc.  I will be working in some
very low light next week and I have visited the venue and can get some away
with 1/30sec to 1/60sec with my Noctilux using 1600ASA film.

Thanks.

Simon
Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Fuji Neopan 1600 vs Ilford Delta 3200 @ 1600)
Reply from tom <thomas@bigdayphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Fuji Neopan 1600 vs Ilford Delta 3200 @ 1600)
 In reply to: Message from "Dan Honemann" <ddh@home.com> (RE: [Leica] Should I buy a Noctilux?)