Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] WAS: Bokeh'm somebody, naw nuke it! ;-)
From: "Rodgers, David" <david.rodgers@xo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 18:03:10 -0500

Dan,

With all due respect, I don't think it's the differences in the out of focus
areas that make or break these images. 

Dave

- -----Original Message-----
From: Dan Honemann [mailto:danh@selectsa.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 10:35 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] WAS: Bokeh'm somebody, naw nuke it! ;-)


> >>For example, both wildlife and portrait photography can be enhanced by
> good bokeh or can be marred by the lack thereof.<<
>
> I'd sure like to seen an example of good and lacking bokeh. I'm not
> skeptical. I'm curious.

The good:
http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/NHOW.HTM
http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/BUOR.HTM

The bad:
http://people.oven.com/jbm/temp-displays/bokeh/c3990719-28a%5bwhitpit%5d1410
.jpeg

And the ugly:
http://members.aol.com/zeissleica/private/Bluebells.jpg

Dan

Replies: Reply from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> (RE: [Leica] WAS: Bokeh'm somebody, naw nuke it! ;-))