Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have the 75 'lux and use it often. It is handholdable at lower speeds than my 90 and fast as well. It does not replace either my 50 (I'd never give up a 50) or the 90, but I use the 90 less. My most common use for it is portraits or when my Noctilux is a little "short". Ken Wilcox At 4:27 -0400 7/8/1, a fine scholar, A Leica Shooter wrote: >It seems that most folks opt to shoot with the 28,35,50, and 90. There >does not seem to be much mention of the 75 Summilux on the list. For >those of you shooting with the 75, why? Why did you opt to buy the lens? >Has it replaced either or both the 50 and 90? > >My main interested is in a replacement for the 50. Currently I have both >the 35 and 90 Summicron. I am considering either the 75 or 50. What are >your thoughts and why? > >A Lecia Shooter - ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com> <kwilcox@gfn.org>