Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Q for the 75 Summlux-M shooters...
From: Ken Wilcox <>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 17:04:17 -0400

I have the 75 'lux and use it often. It is handholdable at lower speeds
than my 90 and fast as well. It does not replace either my 50 (I'd never
give up a 50) or the 90, but I use the 90 less.

My most common use for it is portraits or when my Noctilux is a little "short".

Ken Wilcox

At 4:27 -0400 7/8/1, a fine scholar, A Leica Shooter wrote:

>It seems that most folks opt to shoot with the 28,35,50, and 90.  There
>does not seem to be much mention of the 75 Summilux on the list.  For
>those of you shooting with the 75, why?  Why did you opt to buy the lens?
>Has it replaced either or both the 50 and 90?
>My main interested is in a replacement for the 50.  Currently I have both
>the 35 and 90 Summicron.  I am considering either the 75 or 50.  What are
>your thoughts and why?
>A Lecia Shooter

- ----
Ken Wilcox                                Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
					  preferred---> <>

Replies: Reply from "A Leica Shooter" <> (Re: [Leica] Re: Q for the 75 Summlux-M shooters...)
Reply from Ken Wilcox <> ([Leica] Re: Re: Q for the 75 Summlux-M shooters...)