Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 80-200 flare (was:Re: Copyright questions)
From: "Eric" <>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:58:59 -0500
References: <> <>


>I'd guess that the Leica came out on top, since it costs more than twice as much
>as the AF-S 80-200/2.8.  Probably 10%-20% better

I thought you said that Nikon's top glass was just as expensive as Leica's,
and that pictures between the two were indistinguishable from one another.
I must have misunderstood, or I'm not remembering accurately.


Replies: Reply from "Mxsmanic" <> (Re: [Leica] Re: 80-200 flare (was:Re: Copyright questions))
In reply to: Message from Doug Herr <> (80-200 flare (was:Re: [Leica] Copyright questions))
Message from "Mxsmanic" <> (Re: 80-200 flare (was:Re: [Leica] Copyright questions))