Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica] Re: Warranty & New vs. Used
From: "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:00:19 -0700
References: <200106032130.OAA04796@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <OE67Rf6Ci6nx8dyDd3O0000586e@hotmail.com>

> I think both the U.S. and France probably get a worse deal on Japanese
gear, but
> I haven't actually looked up prices and compared.

For most of the consumer-level stuff, it's hardly any more expensive in the
U.S., and most 35mm camera bodies are about the same.  Where you see the
price jump is in the lenses and accessories.

It's interesting to see that Japanese MF stuff is much, much cheaper in
Japan than elsewhere.  Someone in the industry told me that in Japan, they
have to be priced a lot lower than Hasselblads because Japanese
photographers would not pay Hasselblad prices for Japanese cameras.  On the
otherhand, they have to be priced much higher, because American or European
photographers would be suspicious that these cameras are inferior, if priced
way below that of Hasselblad.  As you can see, Mamiya and Bronica cameras,
as far as I have seen, cost about twice as much in the U.S. than in Japan.

In reply to: Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> ([Leica] Leica] Re: Warranty & New vs. Used)