Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: >>>> [Leica] cl? nah -- get a ql17
From: Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 14:38:11 -0700
References: <200105282030.QAA09396@unix3.netaxs.com>

>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>From: "Kyle Cassidy" <cassidy@netaxs.com>
>>>>>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>>>>>Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 3:30 PM
>>>>>Subject: [Leica] cl? nah -- get a ql17
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> >I'm looking into possibly buying a Leica user to
>>>>>> >carry with me daily.  Is the Leica CL w/ a 40
>>>>>> >Summicron (not the Leica Minolta or Minolta CLE) a viable
>>>>>> >alternative to buying a M4-P or an M6 user
>>>>>> >with 35 Summicron?  The CL/40 combo would certainly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> no. get yourself a canon ql17. theyre only about $40.
>>>>>faster and more
>>>>>> sophisticated than the QL, and fully manual operation
>>>>>possible without
>>>>>> batteries. the CLE, on the other hand, is a nice camera.
>>>>>the ql's a dog.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> just my .02.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <cassidy@netaxs.com> ([Leica] cl? nah -- get a ql17)