Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] cl? nah -- get a ql17
From: "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 15:38:19 -0500
References: <200105282030.QAA09396@unix3.netaxs.com>

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle Cassidy" <cassidy@netaxs.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 3:30 PM
Subject: [Leica] cl? nah -- get a ql17


> >I'm looking into possibly buying a Leica user to
> >carry with me daily.  Is the Leica CL w/ a 40
> >Summicron (not the Leica Minolta or Minolta CLE) a viable
> >alternative to buying a M4-P or an M6 user
> >with 35 Summicron?  The CL/40 combo would certainly
>
> no. get yourself a canon ql17. theyre only about $40.
faster and more
> sophisticated than the QL, and fully manual operation
possible without
> batteries. the CLE, on the other hand, is a nice camera.
the ql's a dog.
>
> just my .02.
>
> kc
>
>

In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <cassidy@netaxs.com> ([Leica] cl? nah -- get a ql17)