Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 5/28/01 7:07:33 AM, owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us writes: << I'm looking into possibly buying a Leica user to carry with me daily. Is the Leica CL w/ a 40 Summicron (not the Leica Minolta or Minolta CLE) a viable alternative to buying a M4-P or an M6 user with 35 Summicron? The CL/40 combo would certainly be cheaper...yet I've heard the CL model has meter and finder shortcomings... I know the CL and its lenses are not really compatible with the M series...any former or current CL owners that can speak of the advantages/limitations of this camera? >> The Leica CL is a great carry camera if you don't subject it to heavy professional use, say more than ten 36exp. rolls a day. It's half the weight of an M series camera yet will mount most M series lenses (with a few exceptions). The view through the finder is quite good, although not up to the standard of a pristine M6 but far better than most older user Ms with age degraded rangefinder elements. The shorter RF baseline limits you to normal f2.0 lenses and f3.5 short telephotos. You can fit and focus any wide angle you can mount. The match needle meter works fine and can be easily adjusted by any repair person. The 40mm f2.0 Summicron usually supplied with the camera as a normal lens is of excellent quality. Some rate it as one of Leicas best normal lenses. Despite the protests of Leica purists, the Minolta 40mm F2.0 supplied with the Minolta version of the camera performs equally as well. Despite the early Leica disinformation about differing rangefinder cam slopes, the lenses sold with the CL work just fine on any M series camera. Incidentally, there is no difference between the Leica and Minolta CL versions of the camera except the engraving of the name I have owned a CL since its introduction and have used it pretty hard over the last 20 years. It is a favorite camera to take on vacations because of its small size and weight. Moreover, it does not scream affluence when taken to lesser developed countries. It looks like any old P&S, hardly worth a theft attempt. (Of course this may be a turn off for you.) I have found that the 40 mm f2 Summicron and the tiny, but superb, Canon 100mm f3.5 with a 90mm screw to M mount satisfy most of my picture taking needs. The 90mm frame in the finder almost exactly covers the image size of the 100mm lens. If you get a CL and want it professionally evaluated or CLAd, I recommend Sherry Krauter. She trained in Germany as a CL technician and taught the first Leica CL repair classes in the USA. Larry Zeitlin