Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Street Foto
From: Gerry Walden <gerrywalden@cwcom.net>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:01:19 +0100

- --=====================_6751236==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 08:57 25-05-01 +0200, you wrote:
>It follows then that a photographer who takes pictures of perfect
>strangers in public must be guilty of a form of photographic rape.

Does it follow then that all us photographers who buy books by street 
photographers are guilty of buying pornography.

There are those that would argue strongly (myself amongst them) that the 
purpose of photography is to record life. Philip Jones Griffiths put it 
thus: "...to me there is no point in pressing the shutter unless you are 
making some comment on the incongruities in life. That is what photography 
is all about. It is the only reason for doing it." There is another quote 
(name forgotten) that adds: "It is the purpose of photography to explain 
man to man, and man to himself".

Without street photography we would have scant record of the last 150 
years, and I find it difficult to imagine the absence of the 
socio-documentary input of those that so many of us consider 'greats'. It 
is the street photography that has shown us so much of what is good and 
what is bad in our contemporary lives.

Guilty of rape I am not, but I may hold my hand up to a charge of voyeurism.

Gerry



- --=====================_6751236==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<font size=3>At 08:57 25-05-01 +0200, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>It follows then that a photographer
who takes pictures of perfect<br>
strangers in public must be guilty of a form of photographic rape.<br>
</blockquote><br>
Does it follow then that all us photographers who buy books by street
photographers are guilty of buying pornography. <br><br>
There are those that would argue strongly (myself amongst them) that the
purpose of photography is to record life. Philip Jones Griffiths put it
thus: &quot;...to me there is no point in pressing the shutter unless you
are making some comment on the incongruities in life. That is what
photography is all about. It is the only reason for doing it.&quot; There
is another quote (name forgotten) that adds: &quot;It is the purpose of
photography to explain man to man, and man to himself&quot;.<br><br>
Without street photography we would have scant record of the last 150
years, and I find it difficult to imagine the absence of the
socio-documentary input of those that so many of us consider 'greats'. It
is the street photography that has shown us so much of what is good and
what is bad in our contemporary lives.<br><br>
Guilty of rape I am not, but I may hold my hand up to a charge of
voyeurism.<br><br>
Gerry<br><br>
<br>
</font></html>

- --=====================_6751236==_.ALT--